diff options
| author | Wine93 <wine93.info@gmail.com> | 2019-04-30 03:23:34 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Wine93 <wine93.info@gmail.com> | 2019-04-30 03:23:34 +0000 |
| commit | 8b51c16e2c7b73a571c04cc43cba78b54841dd12 (patch) | |
| tree | eda72514de5aa891a7db569c4f8cc213ccb8f94e /README.md | |
| parent | 6cba139458543b1d26494f96c74a23284031be6f (diff) | |
| download | seaweedfs-8b51c16e2c7b73a571c04cc43cba78b54841dd12.tar.xz seaweedfs-8b51c16e2c7b73a571c04cc43cba78b54841dd12.zip | |
doc: added suggestion for code style
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 8 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ GlusterFS hashes the path and filename into ids, and assigned to virtual volumes Ceph can be setup similar to SeaweedFS as a key->blob store. It is much more complicated, with the need to support layers on top of it. [Here is a more detailed comparison](https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/issues/120) -SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage. +SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage. Same as SeaweedFS, Ceph is also based on the object store RADOS. Ceph is rather complicated with mixed reviews. @@ -388,6 +388,12 @@ Other key features include: Erasure Encoding, JWT security. This is a super exciting project! And we need helpers and [support](https://www.patreon.com/seaweedfs)! +BTW, We suggest run the code style check script `util/gostd` before you push your branch to remote, it will make SeaweedFS easy to review, maintain and develop: + +``` +$ ./util/gostd +``` + [Back to TOC](#table-of-contents) ## Installation Guide ## |