diff options
| author | Chris Lu <chrislusf@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-04-29 20:37:31 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2019-04-29 20:37:31 -0700 |
| commit | ac52db3bedbba647cb4531444e16914e6d17b06a (patch) | |
| tree | eda72514de5aa891a7db569c4f8cc213ccb8f94e /README.md | |
| parent | 82e06a780bb12adc47d6036067164c2fd02a25c4 (diff) | |
| parent | 8b51c16e2c7b73a571c04cc43cba78b54841dd12 (diff) | |
| download | seaweedfs-ac52db3bedbba647cb4531444e16914e6d17b06a.tar.xz seaweedfs-ac52db3bedbba647cb4531444e16914e6d17b06a.zip | |
Merge pull request #948 from Wine93/style
Style
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 8 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ GlusterFS hashes the path and filename into ids, and assigned to virtual volumes Ceph can be setup similar to SeaweedFS as a key->blob store. It is much more complicated, with the need to support layers on top of it. [Here is a more detailed comparison](https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/issues/120) -SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage. +SeaweedFS has a centralized master group to look up free volumes, while Ceph uses hashing and metadata servers to locate its objects. Having a centralized master makes it easy to code and manage. Same as SeaweedFS, Ceph is also based on the object store RADOS. Ceph is rather complicated with mixed reviews. @@ -388,6 +388,12 @@ Other key features include: Erasure Encoding, JWT security. This is a super exciting project! And we need helpers and [support](https://www.patreon.com/seaweedfs)! +BTW, We suggest run the code style check script `util/gostd` before you push your branch to remote, it will make SeaweedFS easy to review, maintain and develop: + +``` +$ ./util/gostd +``` + [Back to TOC](#table-of-contents) ## Installation Guide ## |